Will Hillary Clinton mis-speak or blunder, and expect a free ride? She’s issued an apologia to the press to explain her tedious need to drag and drag and drag the race out, and rip and shred any pretense of dignity from the nominating race, and to say why mentioning RFK’s assassination didn’t mean anything.
Well, we’re supposed to believe that you mean what you say, lady (I use the term loosely), and if you merely meant to comment on the length of various nomination campaigns (which is misleading as they didn’t used to start as early as January, like they do now, even where they’re not supposed to, Florida and Michigan, but clearly your grasp of DNC rules is just a teeny bit shaky), well, all you need to say is that the WJC and RFK campaigns were still under weigh in June. Why bring up the word assassination at all?
TACKY. If not nefarious, simply tacky and classless, and RFK Jr. is a better person than you, HRC, for taking you at your word. Of course, IMO he has chosen the wrong candidate. And I don’t particularly believe your word, as you have evoked this before, in print. So either you mean to rub people’s faces in it, or your people are incompetent for not telling you to STFU about it, if you’re not smart enough to see that for yourself.
SOMEBODY over there must see that that was a stupid–at best–thing to say? No?
Oh, and now the spin is that it’s all Obama’s fault for inflaming the issue with the press. That’s right, he reached down your throat and dragged the word ASSASSINATION out of your face. And nobody is paying any attention to what you say unless Obama comments on it. Riiiiiiiiiiiight…….
How many more times…